Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people's questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people's questions & connect with other people.
Volt.Tech
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I have noticed that e2studio uses the term “simple SPI” for the SCI peripherals. I am setting up a new board where I need two SPI connections for my RA4M3 board. One to some motor drivers and one to non-QSPI external flash. I will use the one “standalone SPI” that is available, and then one of the SCI peripherals.
Are there any constraints I need to worry about?
The "simple SPI" mode of the SCI is significantly different than the SPI peripheral. For example the simple-SPI is limited to only 8-databits while the standalone-SPI supports many different bit lengths. If your needs are met by what the simple-SPI supports there is no reason to avoid to using it.
The “simple SPI” mode of the SCI is significantly different than the SPI peripheral.
For example the simple-SPI is limited to only 8-databits while the standalone-SPI supports many different bit lengths. If your needs are met by what the simple-SPI supports there is no reason to avoid to using it.
See less